Department
Psychology
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-2009
Abstract
The present study compared four prominent models of delay discounting: a one-parameter exponential decay, a one-parameter hyperbola (Mazur, 1987), a two-parameter hyperboloid in which the denominator is raised to a power (Green and Myerson, 2004), and a two-parameter hyperbola in which delay is raised to a power (Rachlin, 2006). Sixty-four college undergraduates made choices between hypothetical monetary rewards, one immediate and one delayed, and the fit of the four models to their data was assessed. All four equations accounted for a large proportion of the variance at both the group and the individual levels, but the exponents of both two-parameter models were significantly less than 1.0 at the group level, and frequently so at the individual level. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that more than one parameter is needed to accurately describe delay discounting by humans. Notably, both the Rachlin and the Green and Myerson models accounted for more than 99% of the variance at the group level and for 96% of the variance in the median individual. Because both models provide such good descriptions of the data, model selection will need to be based on other grounds.
Recommended Citation
McKerchar, Todd L.; Green, Leonard; Myerson, Joel; Pickford, T. Stephen; Hill, Jade C.; and Stout, Steven C., "A Comparison of Four Models of Delay Discounting in Humans" (2009). Research, Publications & Creative Work. 54.
https://digitalcommons.jsu.edu/fac_res/54
Publication/Presentation Information
McKerchar, T.L. et al. A Comparison of Four Models of Delay Discounting in Humans. Behavior Processes, 81(2): 256-259. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2008.12.017.