Department
Emergency Management & Public Administration
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2024
Abstract
Abstract Facing the escalating effects of climate change, it is critical to improve the prediction and understanding of the hurricane evacuation decisions made by households in order to enhance emergency management. Current studies in this area often have relied on psychology-driven linear models, which frequently exhibited limitations in practice. The present study proposed a novel interpretable machine learning approach to predict household-level evacuation decisions by leveraging easily accessible demographic and resource-related predictors, compared to existing models that mainly rely on psychological factors. An enhanced logistic regression model (that is, an interpretable machine learning approach) was developed for accurate predictions by automatically accounting for nonlinearities and interactions (that is, univariate and bivariate threshold effects). Specifically, nonlinearity and interaction detection were enabled by low-depth decision trees, which offer transparent model structure and robustness. A survey dataset collected in the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, two of the most intense tropical storms of the last two decades, was employed to test the new methodology. The findings show that, when predicting the households’ evacuation decisions, the enhanced logistic regression model outperformed previous linear models in terms of both model fit and predictive capability. This outcome suggests that our proposed methodology could provide a new tool and framework for emergency management authorities to improve the prediction of evacuation traffic demands in a timely and accurate manner.
Recommended Citation
Sun, Y., Huang, S.-K., & Zhao, X. (2024). Predicting Hurricane Evacuation Decisions with Interpretable Machine Learning Methods. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 15(1), 134-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-024-00541-1
Publication/Presentation Information
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 15(1), 2024,134-148.